Re: Looking forward (?) to RHEL7

[Kevin Thomas <axel2078@gmail.com>]

That does seem like an odd choice. I would stick with the tried and true ext4.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 15, 2013, at 15:18, Steven Pritchard <steve@silug.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 05:32:43PM -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
>> Looks like we may be as much as a year away:
>>
>> http://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/where-is-red-hat-enterprise-linux-7.html
>
> Interesting article, but I have to ask...  What the hell is Red Hat
> smoking?  XFS as the default filesystem?  Not that XFS is a bad
> filesystem, and having it as a supported option is a great thing, but I
> can't imagine why they would want it as the *default*.  It is not and
> never has been a default on any Red Hat or Fedora distribution, and Red
> Hat is notorious for not really testing it.  (As an example, see
> http://serverfault.com/questions/497049/the-xfs-filesystem-is-broken-in-rhel-centos-6-x-what-can-i-do-about-it).
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
> "unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.

-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.