[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 3.0.0 kernel

To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Subject: Re: 3.0.0 kernel
From: "Robert G. (Doc) Savage" <dsavage@peaknet.net>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 11:10:01 -0500
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikcht-Fe9OezLzE38K2HPaJTewRNw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
References: <BANLkTikcht-Fe9OezLzE38K2HPaJTewRNw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Sender: silug-discuss-owner@silug.org

On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 10:43 -0500, Steve Reindl wrote:

I remember reading somewhere, not too awful long ago some FUD about never seeing a 3.0 kernel because the 2.6 kernel was so mature. Apparently Linus is having none of it.

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTUwMg

A rose by any other name -- formerly known as kernel 2.6.40. It has nothing really that special or innovative over kernel 2.6.39.

--Doc

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3.0.0 kernel
  - From: "Jason M. Schindler" <jschindler@bucket440.com>

References:
- 3.0.0 kernel
  - From: Steve Reindl <steve.reindl@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: 3.0.0 kernel
Next by Date: Re: 3.0.0 kernel
Prev by thread: 3.0.0 kernel
Next by thread: Re: 3.0.0 kernel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread