Re: using NFS server with RHEL 6

To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Subject: Re: using NFS server with RHEL 6
From: Tim Hart <codermsu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:01:40 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=P5e+FBNj/BKhB8WftR2hmjpMI7FBSKoJmlfHnftGdOs=; b=uD4ch8oeFUudHCh6M0o5+IQeI4gwJ1ly/KdWJZTpKvhMpdAEGagla2u0T2nR3LyJZ1 65iB0RZHLVX40eonnhDhruaihLzHK7xCx3cufPb5P2SBY0LUfl4LjFFZALn+VZTIU42H 5L8vr/ZwP5aqZvEnU3JEolSSvISjGxwa7Qn8E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=P+F86udwrT+SFJcD2ipZX/VoUHiLoln4y9YL/hD5UBrNXkNMBk3VmObqHegm/mJ2eu 6ziF9F/yqq+MuvFI+82TEdIbbYPlIgzL1YhmJYrGtaarBDysNrnWH7eLfoVxNjXxd4UK IbGAdDH42h/OQpf0zYFdwZxYYyb3IRgklfSY4=
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimhrnSe-KwBWKpy6RQxF=dmUFKgFPw+SorNxpJ+@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
References: <1300334337.5170.31.camel@lion.protogeek.org><013B2FA4-1FDA-429D-8D96-D59B564975EA@gmail.com><121954886eead9d592ff409c270073af@127.0.0.1><AANLkTin_7rBxAtSHf4s9M=QacxPi-6ojK-1oP2M0Utmg@mail.gmail.com><4D842C8B.5010805@gmail.com><AANLkTimhrnSe-KwBWKpy6RQxF=dmUFKgFPw+SorNxpJ+@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Sender: silug-discuss-owner@silug.org

I don't know all the pros and cons, but I have had good luck with nfs4.
It only needs one port and is easy to setup.

Tim

On Mar 19, 2011 1:44 PM, "Kevin Thomas" <axel2078@gmail.com> wrote:

References:
- New CentOS releases
  - From: "Robert G. (Doc) Savage" <dsavage@peaknet.net>
- Re: New CentOS releases
  - From: Kevin Thomas <axel2078@gmail.com>
- Re: New CentOS releases
  - From: Thomas Boxley <thomas@thomasboxley.me>
- Re: New CentOS releases
  - From: "Nathaniel R. Reindl" <nrr@corvidae.org>
- using NFS server with RHEL 6
  - From: Kevin Thomas <axel2078@gmail.com>