[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security

To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Subject: Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security
From: "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@ieee.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:01:22 -0500
Cc: wllmundrwd@charter.net
In-Reply-To: <1134062527.4915.22.camel@bert64.oviedo.smithconcepts.com>
Organization: Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
References: <4jmqt8$1odvj5f@mxip12a.cluster1.charter.net> <1134062527.4915.22.camel@bert64.oviedo.smithconcepts.com>
Reply-To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Sender: silug-discuss-owner@silug.org

On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 12:22 -0500, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> If it's going to your LAN, I agree -- use a firewall that has a
> different _port_ for the DMZ.

Just FYI, IPCop 1.4 allows up to 4 zones -- Internet, DMZ and 2 LANs.

The 2nd LAN is great for segmenting a guest office/room or a WLAN
segment.  That's in addition to the DMZ already offered.

-- 
Bryan J. Smith   mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org
http://thebs413.blogspot.com
------------------------------------------
Some things (or athletes) money can't buy.
For everything else there's "ManningCard."

-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.

References:
- Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security
  - From: William Underwood <wllmundrwd@charter.net>
- Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security
  - From: "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@ieee.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security
Next by Date: Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security
Prev by thread: Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security
Next by thread: Re: Verizon DSL->WIFI Security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread