Re: silug: IP address? -- don't confuse DC functionality with SMB

[Casey Boone <caseyboone@gmail.com>]

On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 04:40:22 -0800, Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith@ieee.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 21:32, Casey Boone wrote:
> > im agreeing with nate here, over the summer i worked with a LARGE
> > (250+ locations, average 1000+ nodes per location, one giant AD tree)
> > network containing everything from nt4 on up and all worked just
> > peachy all the way around the board.  honestly i was very much
> > impressed with just how well everything DID work.
> 
> Again, you'all are talking about DC functionality.  ADS is ADS, and
> Windows Server 2003 _does_ improve ADS.  It not only improves their
> proprietary LDAP/Kerberos solution as well as legacy CIFS (NT4)
> services, but it adds more inter-directory services too.  That's why
> ACLs and other things work, because they work on tokens that come from
> the proprietary Kerberos implementation (or the equivalent, legacy form
> for CIFS).

actually i am talking AD and file sharing.  i honestly was expecting a
problem  with the nt4 clients pulling from the 2k3 file servers, but
didnt see one while i was there.  now it could be due to policies
being handed down from above on the AD tree i admit, but i still
witnessed it happening.

Casey

-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.