[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RH questions
- To: silug-discuss@silug.org
- Subject: Re: RH questions
- From: "Scott C. Linnenbringer" <sl@eskimo.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 16:43:18 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <200309302313.28081.j.e.drews@worldnet.att.net>
- Organization: Independent
- Organization: Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
- References: <200310010130.h911UZY13864@web5.valuenet.net><8218516937.20030930220516@mygirlfriday.info><20030930221757.5a93394e.sl@eskimo.com><200309302313.28081.j.e.drews@worldnet.att.net>
- Reply-To: silug-discuss@silug.org
- Sender: silug-discuss-owner@silug.org
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:13:28 -0500, Jonathan
<j.e.drews@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 September 2003 10:17 pm, you wrote:
> > Contrary to popular belief, Debian does not at all NOT have a
> > history of being current. You can either be current, or you can be
> > stable. Debian gives you a choice.
>
> Very true. Libranet 2.8.1 comes with Kde 3.1.3 and Gnome 2.2.2. Not
> the
> latest releases but recent enough.
> http://www.distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=libran
Librenet isn't directly related to Debian, or the project itself.
It does utilize a lot of the Debian userland (like apt and much of the
Debian-specific tools,) but it has expanded on them in a different way,
and if I recall, has a lot of custom built packages that won't
necessairily work on a Debian system from the stable distribution.
I've never used Librenet though .. I probably should. ;)
--
Scott Christopher Linnenbringer [sl@eskimo.com]
http://www.eskimo.com/~sl/info.txt [sl@moslug.org]
[NOTE: THIS MESSAGE IS DIGITALLY SIGNED WITH GNUPG/PGP]
PGP signature