[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs vs. vi and procmail anti-spam measures

To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Subject: Re: emacs vs. vi and procmail anti-spam measures
From: Gary <medmanks@mcleodusa.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:02:38 -0600
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0203251545030.3754-100000@squishy.ameth.org>; from koree@ameth.org on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 03:47:04PM -0600
Organization: Hardly
Organization: Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0203251538390.6646-100000@goolosh> <Pine.LNX.4.40.0203251545030.3754-100000@squishy.ameth.org>
Reply-To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Sender: silug-discuss-owner@silug.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 03:47:04PM -0600 or thereabouts, KoReE wrote:

> On a side note, is anyone here interested in using procmail to filter for
> spam messages?  If so, let me know.  I have quite a few recipies that I

Koree, can you send me some procmail recipies, I have been thinking of
setting up Spamassasin, but am always looking for recipies. 

thanks
-- 
Best regards,
Gary   

Today's thought: Too much of a good thing can be wonderful.

-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: emacs vs. vi and procmail anti-spam measures
  - From: KoReE <koree@ameth.org>

References:
- Re: emacs vs. vi
  - From: Tighe Schlottog <emry@icephyre.net>
- Re: emacs vs. vi and procmail anti-spam measures
  - From: KoReE <koree@ameth.org>

Prev by Date: Re: emacs vs. vi and procmail anti-spam measures
Next by Date: Re: emacs vs. vi and procmail anti-spam measures
Prev by thread: Re: emacs vs. vi and procmail anti-spam measures
Next by thread: Re: emacs vs. vi and procmail anti-spam measures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread