[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs vs. vi

To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Subject: Re: emacs vs. vi
From: KoReE <koree@ameth.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 15:39:04 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0203241732390.8181-100000@waldorf.rimboy.com>
Organization: Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
Reply-To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Sender: silug-discuss-owner@silug.org

On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Sean /The RIMBoy/ wrote:

>
> > Vi owns.  Vim is nice because of teh pretty hilighting.
>
> For the last time.  Pico (or nano).  I'll admit I miss the pretty
> highlighing, but at least editing is not an exercise in context.
>

Amen.  And it uses some of the Emacs shortcuts.  vi is very powerful, but
highly difficult to learn.

Koree

-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.

References:
- Re: emacs vs. vi
  - From: Sean /The RIMBoy/ <sean@rimboy.com>

Prev by Date: Re: emacs vs. vi
Next by Date: Re: emacs vs. vi
Prev by thread: Re: emacs vs. vi
Next by thread: Re: emacs vs. vi
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread