Re: emacs vs. vi

["Casey Boone" <ophidian@mychoice.net>]

>> Vi owns.  Vim is nice because of teh pretty hilighting.

>For the last time.  Pico (or nano).  I'll admit I miss the pretty
>highlighing, but at least editing is not an exercise in context.

vi... but only if its vim and not true vi

emacs is more bloated than people claim word to be, at least word can
justify some bloat by being a gui app.

for most quick editing i have to agree on the pico/nano choice though.  i
used to be a big fan of joe, but have since discovered pico/nano


Casey


-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.