[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs vs. vi

To: <silug-discuss@silug.org>
Subject: Re: emacs vs. vi
From: "Nate Reindl" <reindlnr@apci.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 13:09:18 -0600
Organization: Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
References: <200203241847.g2OIlc217746@bruneworld.tzo.com>
Reply-To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Sender: silug-discuss-owner@silug.org

To those of you who know what I'm using (read the mail headers), bite me.

Vi owns.  Vim is nice because of teh pretty hilighting.

And, Tighe, doing Solaris upgrades with a 2x cdrom *has* to suck ass.  I
mean... yeesh.  Solaris is slime.  Why are they running Solaris, anyway?
Why not just slap SuSE on there and not tell anybody?  ;)

--
Nate Reindl << OTHS Web Mastah
reindlnr@apci.net


-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: emacs vs. vi
  - From: KoReE <koree@ameth.org>
- Re: emacs vs. vi
  - From: Sean /The RIMBoy/ <sean@rimboy.com>

References:
- Re: emacs vs. vi
  - From: SILUG <silug@bruneworld.tzo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: emacs vs. vi
Next by Date: Solaris Holy War (was emacs vs. vi holy war)
Prev by thread: Re: emacs vs. vi
Next by thread: Re: emacs vs. vi
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread