[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Firewalling High Speed Interfaces (ATM -> GigE)
Regarding the x86, they do use PIIIs:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/fw/sqfw500/prodlit/535_ds.htm
Based on the specs it appears that they use 64 bit PCI slots to get the
1Gbps speed though.
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Mark Bishop wrote:
>
>
> Here are a few assumptions:
>
> the PCI bus can only handle around 500MB/s, then add the overhead of the
> firewall and that goes down, unless of course you are using one of the new
> PCI-X standards, which is 64-bit and can handle bursts of up over 1
> gigabit/sec (1066MB/sec). Something like a dual or a quad Xeon should be
> able to handle it. I'd probably go with a quad just to ensure that the
> processors are never the bottleneck and that it's the latency in the PCI
> bus, which you really can't do anything about.
>
> But, again I'd probably go get a Cisco, just because they are more adapt
> at doing just this thing.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Richard Fifarek wrote:
>
> > The folks that I work for want to place a firewall between us and
> > the "outside world" to help minimize our exposure. We have an ATM OC-3
> > (155 Mb/s) link currently, and eventually that will be expanded to GigE.
> > My question is with a fairly vanilla firewall set (allow Ssh, HTTP/HTTPS,
> > SMTP, FTP; disallow everything else), what kind of horse power will this
> > require? What kind of lag can I expect? At OC-3 speeds, I'm guessing
> > that most machines could handle the load, however when it jumps up to
> > GigE, I expect problems. With 2.4 supporting threaded IP stack, SMP makes
> > sense 2-4 processors. Would Xeon's extra cache make a difference?
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > Richard H. Fifarek rfifarek@silug.org
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
> > "unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
> "unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.
>
-----------------------------------------------------
Richard H. Fifarek rfifarek@silug.org
-----------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.