[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ssh
On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Lee Helpingstine wrote:
> Having to deal with OpenSSL and the other pain in the ass prerequisites
> have kept me from OpenSSH.
Well, I guess your not using OpenSSL for your web stuff either. So it
goes.
> ssh 3.0.1 with no problems on my other machines. My problem is having to
> install 9932402942 libs before I install software when I can install one
> evil, commercial package in half the time?
Sorry, I'll take the time to install the free package rather than the
closed package from an arrogant company anyday. I cannot speak of the
libs problems you refer to... at least not on that level.
> :) If you keep up on
> security holes, something a responsible admin should do anyway,
> you'll have no problems with either.
That's right.
> There is no guarantee that OpenSSH
> won't have a security hole found tomorrow that SSH Communications server
> doesn't have.
Yeah, and I seem to recall that SSH Comm's server recently had a
hole. The street runs both ways. Do you want to pay the whiners fee or
would you rather have Theo at the helm.
As much as I despise him, I'll take Theo at the helm rather than some
company that complains that the protocal name interfere's with their
company name. Sound familiar to anyone? It's the reason I use Linux /
Unix rather than some other crappy OS that supposedly had a major release
today.
Sean...
--
Believing I had supernatural powers, I slammed into a brick wall.
--Paul Simon
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
KG4NRC
www.rimboy.com <-- Your source for the crap you know you need.
-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ssh
- From: Lee Helpingstine <sig11@reprehensible.net>
- References:
- Re: ssh
- From: Lee Helpingstine <sig11@reprehensible.net>