[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Defrag
Lee Helpingstine said:
> The ext2 filesystem (filesystem that linux uses) is a lot less prone to
> fragmentation.
To be more specific, *any* real filesytem (even including NTFS) is
going to be less prone to fragmentation than FAT{12,16,32}. For that
matter, real operating systems tend to move bits around to avoid
fragmentation if necessary. This is why ext2 has a "reserved"
overhead that only root can write to, so that there is always some
free disk to avoid fragmentation... (It also is useful in case a
filesystem is filled and things need to be written to /lost+found or
root needs to use disk to clean up.)
> You'll probably never need to defragment, but there are a
> couple defragmenters out there...
They really aren't necessary. They're probably dangerous too.
Steve
--
steve@silug.org | Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
(618)398-7320 | See web site for meeting details.
Steven Pritchard | http://www.silug.org/
-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.
- References:
- Re: Defrag
- From: Lee Helpingstine <sig11@ideacomputers.com>