[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Disk Partition Size

To: SILUG <silug-discuss@silug.org>
Subject: Re: Disk Partition Size
From: Lee Helpingstine <sig11@ideacomputers.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 15:05:34 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9912141503280.1848-100000@squishy.ameth.org>
Organization: Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
Reply-To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Sender: owner-silug-discuss@silug.org


Its still 8GB isn't it?  That is unless you use the patch from, ah, SGI
was it?

	Lee

On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, KoReE wrote:

> 
> Does anyone know what the largest partition size that the 2.2.x kernels
> can handle is?  This is with a new BIOS, so the 1024 cylinders thing
> should not be a problem.  I've been looking through www.linuxdoc.org, but
> haven't yet found anything...
> 
> Koree


--
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Disk Partition Size
  - From: Tom <minotaur@home.carbondale.ultisat.net>

References:
- Disk Partition Size
  - From: KoReE <koree@ameth.org>

Prev by Date: Disk Partition Size
Next by Date: Re: Disk Partition Size
Prev by thread: Disk Partition Size
Next by thread: Re: Disk Partition Size
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread