[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: KDE vs Gnome

To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Subject: Re: KDE vs Gnome
From: Chris Tessone <tessone@imsa.edu>
Date: 18 Oct 1998 03:47:10 -500
In-Reply-To: Mark Bishop's message of "Sun, 5 Apr 1998 08:39:21 -0500 (CDT)"
Organization: Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980405083803.20975A-100000@knuth.bish.net>
Reply-To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Sender: owner-silug-discuss@silug.org
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0700000000000003 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.34) Emacs/20.2


>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Bishop <mark@bish.net> writes:

    Mark> I'm going to dance lightly around this issue by just saying:
    Mark> 3:07am up 214 days, 14:31h, 0 users, load average: 0.99,
    Mark> 0.98, 0.99

Just curious: what is this box doing to have a load average of 0.99
with no users? :-)

Chris

-- 
Chris Tessone         tessone@fnal.gov         tessone@imsa.edu
PH/sendmail SNPC        System Administration        Perl/Shell
All you need is Perl, love. Perl is all you need.
http://www.imsa.edu/~tessone/

--
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.

References:
- Re: KDE vs Gnome
  - From: Mark Bishop <mark@bish.net>

Prev by Date: Re: KDE vs Gnome
Next by Date: GUI FTP Client
Prev by thread: Re: KDE vs Gnome
Next by thread: Re: KDE vs Gnome
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread