[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Redhat dropping support for BTRFS

To: "silug-discuss@silug.org" <silug-discuss@silug.org>
Subject: Redhat dropping support for BTRFS
From: Andrew Bauer <knnniggett@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 18:57:17 +0000
Accept-Language: en-US
authentication-results: silug.org; dkim=none (message not signed)header.d=none;silug.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hotmail.com;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com;s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version;bh=RNfANV77DzOpoM2a177yLMYQhPelWxD21mAd4UoomEA=;b=FxOJMMt5SGSyWl6QC030fme1wy17mG9C/i5krbYqdU0DILVqmPm4RetPqj4/Yf/aEUikKs0LRI3T6jlk4TSyh3QhBXugn3K//M8TLJz4Zcx1TWCYsGLgdpqnPcd75FldH9+KvRoZEE2ZZJsL/qYHBX48jzoW27+KnLA293rpDNcHVoQsPz9ThtekrMFaQMQhg2tsqJvZvYL/WR/54H/I3ztA4/s6g9/BnWDSYak42J94gvBQjDg4zdQ0pLHgS7eHxstBazcLLtSkRaZ+TfOMlqV0Ac/V/66V7FjPvcAXrfrNGtAcSGk2iSP7n3YR2sYy3qRAe+zf/2hPerV77VxIjQ==
Organization: Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
Reply-To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Sender: silug-discuss-owner@silug.org
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
Thread-Index: AQHTDVKvWN5G+cVXz0ybjIfg9lvRFQ==
Thread-Topic: Redhat dropping support for BTRFS

I don't use btrfs myself. Since it has been discussed previously in our group, I thought I'd relay what showed up in the Fedora developers list today:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/YHOOGJWGKDFZ4KZEV3MLTCJTA3VKW2PS/

which references this:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/7.4_Release_Notes/chap-Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux-7.4_Release_Notes-Deprecated_Functionality.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Redhat dropping support for BTRFS
  - From: Steven Pritchard <steve@silug.org>

Next by Date: Re: Redhat dropping support for BTRFS
Prev by thread: Free books, magazines, and DVDs
Next by thread: Re: Redhat dropping support for BTRFS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread