[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Partitioning >2.2 TB drives
- To: "'Robert G. (Doc) Savage'" <dsavage@peaknet.net>
- Subject: Re: Partitioning >2.2 TB drives
- From: "Mike Granito" <mgranito@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 10:58:03 -0400
- Cc: <silug-discuss@silug.org>
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=/mOCEmPAKAUdSlevKAqLG/JRLS3Mb2NDcWPRxPQy5iM=; b=JeziMOf9IOAomCAqc7EZVu09EV57k3L7bcSmV/jwDs3h/l6J7b/2S1M18TakjCy6GD NuzOeC+HJfsoAQESQ+6T2QV/p5Oz9Y0VgSTXkJg2lvznmMSg55Ca88a6VPKSJU/w4i9M H8GApoANIaH65TISxcrT1CB1vvYxJZl7CqE55MEfdW5GI9Q57ENlG3KX1glI5J+BvbKS 5E+km2lGPgnZh1Glf0m2rqFUypZKvylmu3i3uo7IPi7TX+LQIw0tsN72+F73MrJzUxKn K0//LEa9oHuu+NmyAFNFJHOj/Ec8cW7/O8wFxV9RLIhD9enFwN2YfrflLGo4yZIiY4/S kAVg==
- In-Reply-To: <1367115111.5162.40.camel@lion.protogeek.org>
- Organization: Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
- References: <1982779818166890862@unknownmsgid> <1367115111.5162.40.camel@lion.protogeek.org>
- Reply-To: silug-discuss@silug.org
- Sender: silug-discuss-owner@silug.org
- thread-index: AQIbf2rasi4UoHdvguGlhLgDJlq34gE3jpbomEeFzvA=
How do you plan on setting this up and why would you use ext4 when either zfs or btfrs seem to be better at larger volumes. I would lean more ZFS just due to all the redundancy built into it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert G. (Doc) Savage [mailto:dsavage@peaknet.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2013 10:12 PM
To: Michael Granito
Cc: silug-discuss@silug.org
Subject: RE: Partitioning >2.2 TB drives
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 12:35 -0700, Michael Granito wrote:
> Doc,
>
> It could very well be an issue with USB adapter. Is there any way you
> could use esata?
Michael,
I should have thought of that. I have a Thermaltake BlacX eSATA+USB2 external "toaster", and with it gparted sees 3.64 TiB and can install a GPT partition table. It takes 25 minutes to create an ext4 filesystem.
# gdisk -l /dev/sda
GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 0.8.4
Partition table scan:
MBR: protective
BSD: not present
APM: not present
GPT: present
Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT.
Disk /dev/sda: 7814037168 sectors, 3.6 TiB
Logical sector size: 512 bytes
Disk identifier (GUID): A69992CB-B312-429F-A287-093EE78B5AB5
Partition table holds up to 128 entries
First usable sector is 34, last usable sector is 7814037134
Partitions will be aligned on 8-sector boundaries
Total free space is 5070 sectors (2.5 MiB)
Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name
1 34 7814032064 3.6 TiB 0700
# df /mnt
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 3845708116 200704 3650156612 1% /mnt
# df -h /mnt
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 3.6T 196M 3.4T 1% /mnt
If my math is correct, with these drives a fully-loaded Backblaze would have a capacity of about 133 TB. I'm also guessing it would weigh something like 80 lbs.
--Doc
-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.