That's exactly the reason I switched to SL too. I built my own home
NAS with Scientific Linux and it's been working great. I had all my
data stored under FreeNAS for a long time, but the transfer rates
were super slow, so I decided I wanted a linux based NAS and chose
SL have haven't looked back since. I got so tired of all the
arguing in the CentOS forum and the continuous string of delays and
jumped shipped and I don't regret it at all.
Kevin
On 12/5/2012 4:11 PM, Casey Boone
wrote:
CA+xyGQzWHqBdyUCNpL_XRJeCLhJM8T2FjPcBiQOEaZ5hUc95ww@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
That is the reason a lot of us switched honestly
On Dec 5, 2012 12:18 PM, "Kevin Thomas"
< axel2078@gmail.com>
wrote:
+1 for Scientific Linux. They have a paid staff of
developers and don't tend to tell their users to shut up
and wait when a new release is expected.
Sent from my iPhone
Scientific linux works as well, both are recompiled
RHEL more or less
On Dec 3, 2012 7:58 PM, "Steven
Pritchard" < steve@silug.org>
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 07:46:24PM -0600, Ken Keefe
wrote:
> My question is, do we need to just buy RHEL 5.8
and build it like we always
> do it. Or, is there a version of Fedora that
lines up with RHEL 5.8 in
> terms of gcc and library versions? Does Fedora
and RHEL use the same or
> similar package repositories?
Build for CentOS 5.8, and it will install and run
fine on RHEL 5.8.
-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org
with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.
|