[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ZFS or Btrfs

To: Robert Threet <rthreet@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: ZFS or Btrfs
From: Steven Pritchard <steve@silug.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 19:02:26 -0500
Cc: Southern LUG <silug-discuss@silug.org>
In-Reply-To: <1338837242.46988.YahooMailNeo@web162601.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Steven Pritchard <steve@silug.org>,Robert Threet <rthreet@yahoo.com>,Southern LUG <silug-discuss@silug.org>
Organization: Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
References: <1338837242.46988.YahooMailNeo@web162601.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Reply-To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Sender: silug-discuss-owner@silug.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 12:14:02PM -0700, Robert Threet wrote:
> I heard Steve say he lost data with Btrfs (or nearly?).

I don't believe I've actually lost any data with btrfs, but I did have a
corrupted filesystem once that I couldn't fix without an fsck (which
btrfs has now, I think), so I had to recreate the filesystem and rsync
data over.  Annoying, but no data lost...

Steve
-- 
steve@silug.org           | Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
(618)624-4440             | See web site for meeting details.
Steven Pritchard          | http://www.silug.org/

-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.

References:
- ZFS or Btrfs
  - From: Robert Threet <rthreet@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: ZFS or Btrfs
Next by Date: Oops... Meeting tonight.
Prev by thread: ZFS or Btrfs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread