Re: 2.5" v. 3.5" SATA for desktop

["Chuck @ chuck-king" <chuck@chuck-king.com>]

Off the top of my head I'd think the bigger platers would offer faster performance, if it's true that longer  tracks reduce overall seek time.

- cwkingjr@gmail.com -

On Aug 4, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Wolfgang <wolfgangmob@gmail.com> wrote:

> Has anyone ever compared or know of any real stats on the performance of 7200 rpm 2.5" vs 7200 rpm 3.5" drives?  In my case I'm thinking about dual 7200rpm 2.5" 500GB or 750GB drives to replace my single 1TB 7200 rpm 3.5" drive as in transport my drives have taken damage in the past, plus there is no easy way to mount two drives in my case.  The overall plan is doing a RAID 1 then use a large external for back ups, as far as speed and performance, I don't play any real high end games so if performance is respectable I would be fine, just looking at the idea right now so looking for input, comments as well.
> 
> -- 
> "You must control your future by taking command of your present, and fixing and learning from your past."
> 
> "When history is forgotten people don't realize when it repeats."
> 


-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.