Re: FC4/x86_64 and ALSA: [long] noise and distortion

["Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@ieee.org>]

"Robert G. (Doc) Savage" <dsavage@peaknet.net> wrote:
> Steve,
> FWIW, a FC3 -> FC4 upgrade on this 32-bit laptop produced a
> barely functioning mutant that I had to put out of its misery.

Oh, I don't know, a lot of people complained about RHL8.0 too,
RHL7[.0] before that, RHL5.0 before that, etc...  FC4 is
definitely a radical departure from FC3, just like FC2 was
from FC1, etc...

Frankly, the _only_ difference between Red Hat Linux and
Fedora Core is that they don't _warn_you_ with a ".0," which
continues to be my largest gripe.  

> I'm afraid FC4 will go down in history as one of the most 
> aggressive and buggy Fedora releases to date. There really 
> should have been one or two more test releases before it was
> pronounced RFPT.

And a lot of people could say the same about FC2, RHL8.0,
RHL7[.0] (even I did on 7.0 ;-), RHL5.0, etc...



-- 
Bryan J. Smith                 mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org
Sent from Yahoo Mail (please excuse any missing headers)

-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.