[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HP abandons Itanium2 in workstations
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:50:58AM -0500, Robert Citek wrote:
> What's the difference between the Opteron and the Athlong64? Are they
> not the same thing?
Almost. The short answer is the Opteron is a server (and high-end
workstation) processor, and the Athlon64 is a consumer processor. The
long answer is that the Opterons and Athlon64s use the same core
(64-bit, but with full 32-bit compatibility[*]). The differences
between the Opterons and the various Athlon64s are the socket type
used (940-pin, 939-pin, or 754-pin), memory compatibility, and cache
size. The various Opteron models are numbered based on their SMP
compatibility (1xx for 1-way, 2xx for 2-way, 8xx for 8-way).
Here's a little table that may or may not help:
Model # Socket Freq Memory technology Cache
------- --- ------ ------- --------------------------- -----
Opteron 850 940 2.4GHz Dual-channel DDR (ECC Reg.) 1MB
Opteron 848 940 2.2GHz Dual-channel DDR (ECC Reg.) 1MB
Opteron 846 940 2.0GHz Dual-channel DDR (ECC Reg.) 1MB
Opteron 844 940 1.8GHz Dual-channel DDR (ECC Reg.) 1MB
Opteron 842 940 1.6GHz Dual-channel DDR (ECC Reg.) 1MB
Opteron 840 940 1.4GHz Dual-channel DDR (ECC Reg.) 1MB
Opteron 2xx 940 1.4GHz+ Dual-channel DDR (ECC Reg.) 1MB
Opteron 1xx 940 1.4GHz+ Dual-channel DDR (ECC Reg.) 1MB
Athlon64 FX-51 940 2.0GHz Dual-channel DDR (ECC Reg.) 1MB
Athlon64 FX-53 940 2.4GHz Dual-channel DDR (ECC Reg.) 1MB
Athlon64 FX-53 939 2.4GHz Dual-channel DDR 1MB
Athlon64 3800+ 939 2.4GHz Dual-channel DDR 512KB
Athlon64 3500+ 939 2.2GHz Dual-channel DDR 512KB
Athlon64 3200+ 939 2.0GHz Dual-channel DDR 512KB
Athlon64 3000+ 939 1.8GHz Dual-channel DDR 512KB
Athlon64 3700+ 754 2.4GHz Single-channel DDR 1MB
Athlon64 3400+ 754 2.4GHz Single-channel DDR 512KB
Athlon64 3200+ 754 2.0GHz Single-channel DDR 1MB
Athlon64 3000+ 754 2.0GHz Single-channel DDR 512KB
Athlon64 2800+ 754 1.8GHz Single-channel DDR 512KB
(If it isn't obvious from the table, the Socket 940 Athlon64 FX-51 and
FX-54 are otherwise known as the Opteron 146 and Opteron 150,
respectively.)
Throw the Socket 754 Semprons in the mix, and I get really confused. :-)
Oh, and some of that table came from here:
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_9485_9487^10248,00.html
[*] By "64-bit, but with full 32-bit compatibility", what I meant was
that these processors all will run in either 32-bit mode (I have a
customer running RH9/i386 on some Opterons), "mixed" 32/64-bit
mode (64-bit kernel, 32-bit userspace), or full 64-bit mode
(64-bit kernel, 64-bit userspace). For reasons I won't go into
right now, running 64-bit all the way is best, but 32-bit runs
just fine (and quite quickly, faster than similarly clocked Athlon
XPs).
Steve
--
steve@silug.org | Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
(618)398-3000 | See web site for meeting details.
Steven Pritchard | http://www.silug.org/
-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.