[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *BSD
I don't (by any means) want to argue with Jonathan here, but I do need
to point out something.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 04:21:49PM +0000, j.e.drews@att.net wrote:
> 1) FreeBSD has more recent software than Linux. Example: I have
> Gnumeric 1.2.6 (soon to be 1.2.7), and the latest version of
> OpenOffice, Gnome, Xfce as well.
[...]
> 3) It's easy to update and install FreeBSD ports. I can upgrade all
> of Kde by simply typing the command:
> # ./run.cvsup.ports; portsdb -Uu; pourtupgrade -arR;
>
> before I go to bed. In the morning, Kde will be updated from 3.2.0 to
> 3.2.1. It's this "fire and forget" nature of FreeBSD ports that make
> it wonderful.
Both of those are a function of the distribution, not the OS. In the
case of FreeBSD, the distribution *is* the OS, but the same isn't true
of Linux systems.
Personally, I prefer the "apt-get upgrade" route to building
everything on my own system.
Steve
--
steve@silug.org | Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
(618)398-7360 | See web site for meeting details.
Steven Pritchard | http://www.silug.org/
-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: *BSD
- From: Jonathan <j.e.drews@worldnet.att.net>