[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Debian et. al.

To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Subject: Re: Debian et. al.
From: "Scott C. Linnenbringer" <sl@panix.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 12:32:33 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20031018075554.21c1b104.hcrouch@mchsi.com>
Organization: Independent
Organization: Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
References: <200310180122.h9I1MfO18775@web5.valuenet.net><20031018075554.21c1b104.hcrouch@mchsi.com>
Reply-To: silug-discuss@silug.org
Sender: silug-discuss-owner@silug.org

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 07:55:54 -0500, Harold Crouch <hcrouch@mchsi.com>
wrote: 

<...>
> Debian
> 
> No, that installer will *not* ever get any better. I'm convinced that
> Debian likes it just as it is.  It's a Rite of Passage with them. 
> Anyone unable to survive that gantlet is deemed too stupid to be
> using Debian. 

That's interesting, since the current development on Debian is heading
in the direction of a new installer, to replace boot-floppies. It will
release with sarge.

http://people.debian.org/~mbc/di.html

... and I must note, Debian won the Linux Journal Readers' Choice Award,
as well. ;)

http://www.debian.org/News/2003/20031010

-- 
scott c. linnenbringer    |  sl@panix.com
http://www.panix.com/~sl  | sl@moslug.org
jabber: sl@theoretic.com  |  irc: Jawoota

PGP signature

References:
- Re: divx avi's
  - From: mike808@users.sourceforge.net
- Debian et. al.
  - From: Harold Crouch <hcrouch@mchsi.com>

Prev by Date: Re: divx avi's
Next by Date: Re: Debian et. al.
Prev by thread: Debian et. al.
Next by thread: Re: divx avi's
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread