Re: project managment suggestions

["john doe" <ophidian_snake@hotmail.com>]

>From: fiaid@quasi-sane.com
>Reply-To: silug-discuss@silug.org
>To: silug-discuss@silug.org
>Subject: Re: project managment suggestions
>Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 07:37:31 -0600 (CST)
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from web1.lanscape.net ([64.240.156.194]) by 
>mc3-f41.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Thu, 9 Jan 
>2003 05:37:51 -0800
>Received: from silug.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])by web1.lanscape.net 
>(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h09Dbf418284;Thu, 9 Jan 2003 07:37:41 -0600
>Received: from n00bz.net (n00bz.net [64.240.156.248])by web1.lanscape.net 
>(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h09DbY418227for <silug-discuss@silug.org>; 
>Thu, 9 Jan 2003 07:37:34 -0600
>Received: from localhost (fiaid@localhost)by n00bz.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with 
>ESMTP id h09DbWk10824for <silug-discuss@silug.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 
>07:37:33 -0600
>X-X-Sender: fiaid@n00bz.net
>In-Reply-To: <200301090524.h095Oh229300@web5.valuenet.net>
>Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301090733550.10822-100000@n00bz.net>
>Organization: Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
>Precedence: bulk
>Sender: silug-discuss-owner@silug.org
>Return-Path: silug-discuss-owner+M4345@silug.org
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jan 2003 13:37:51.0925 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[4E9EC650:01C2B7E4]
>
> > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 05:23:20PM -0600, fiaid@quasi-sane.com wrote:
> > > > lol, steve please expand on the RT concept.  thanks. :)
> > >
> > > Do you mind if I expand, Dr. Tighe?
> >
> > Mind expanding, Master Nate? Surely you jest. Your head certainly 
>shouldn't
> > get any larger for fear it doth explodeth with great force.
>
>I was going to go in an offtopic tangent about the girl who blew up like a
>blueberry from Willy Wonka and the Chocolate factory, but I realized we
>don't do that anymore.  ;)
>
> > It also has some nifty workflow features as well. And it's written
> > IN THE MOST POWERFUL LANGUAGE IN THE WORLD. Why, Perl, of course.
>
>Evidently my friend, you have forgotten about assembly!  oh, wait you said
>powerful not, ungodly migraine causer.  my mistake.
>
> > Python, after re-inventing the wheel yet again, and porting every Perl
> > module in sight, still sucks harder than an N'SYNC groupie trying to get
> > backstage. And PHP is like Perl with training wheels. And Java? Let's
> > make the compiler really smart so the language and the programmer can be
> > dumb as a brick. I guess one out of three was the best they could do.
>
>I do believe that they are taking PHP in a new direction.  But I can't
>speak for Java or Python since I believe that both languages should be
>terminated.  :)

i find python to be usually more readable than perl, then again when it 
comes to perl, a true coding challenge would be the UNobfuscated perl code 
contest..... :P

i agree on java though, hate it

_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.