Re: ping vs. traceroute

[Erich Schroeder <erich@museum.state.il.us>]

Ah, thanks. Yup, -I is the switch. 

eks

On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 fiaid@quasi-sane.com wrote:

> that you are using the udp version of traceroute and not the icmp.  there 
> should be a switch for this.  :)
> 
> tighe
> 
> > Hi,
> >   I'm hunting down some problems here, and I was wondering what it means 
> > when one can ping something, but not traceroute to the same address?
> > 
> > traceroute to 10.180.1.10 (10.180.1.10), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
> >  1  192.168.1.1  0.340 ms  0.248 ms  0.243 ms
> >  2  10.180.1.2  1.844 ms  10.940 ms  1.928 ms
> >  3  10.180.1.6  12.359 ms  12.355 ms  12.354 ms
> >  4  * * *
> >  5  *
> > ^c
> > [erich@vrmuseum erich]$ ping 10.180.1.10
> > PING 10.180.1.10 (10.180.1.10) from 192.168.1.184 : 56(84) bytes of data.
> > 64 bytes from 10.180.1.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=61 time=22.1 ms
> > 64 bytes from 10.180.1.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=61 time=12.3 ms
> > 64 bytes from 10.180.1.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=61 time=12.3 ms
> > 64 bytes from 10.180.1.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=61 time=12.5 ms
> > 
> > 
> > eks
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Erich Schroeder                    Phone: (217)785-0033
Curator, Information Technologies  FAX:   (217)785-2857
Illinois State Museum GIS Lab      email:erich(at)illinois.state.museum
                 http://illinois.state.museum/
---------------------------------------------------------------------


-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.