[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT: SANS 2002
> That's funny. I'll freely admit that I tend to agree with most of
> that list. Theo and djb especially. :-)
See below on Larry vs. DJB.
> (Although note that as one
> of the resident raving Perl bigots on this list, I'm *not* going to
> say anything bad about Guido. I'll say bad things about Python all
> day, but it is nothing personal with Guido.)
Ditto.
"Python [still] 5uck5 harder than a groupie trying to get backstage
at an N-Sync concert" -- Gnat
> So if BK is Good, and given Linus's comments on l-k it must be, I have
> *no* problem with LMV selling it. If he wants to let some people use
> it for free, then that's even better. If he wants to dictate who gets
> to use it for free, then that's his right. The rest of us have the
> right to not use his software, but that's about it.
So why is this not a problem here, but is one when applied to DJB?
Ignoring the other issues with DJB, and considering just his licensing
- or lack thereof.
Mike808/
---------------------------------------------
http://www.valuenet.net
-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.