Re: rpm auto get dependencies?

[Steven Pritchard <steve@silug.org>]

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 05:20:53PM -0600, Richard Fifarek wrote:
> 	The prevailing opinion on auto installation is that it is a 
> dangerous means of systems administration, because it isn't smart enough 
> to know what should and shouldn't be on the system.

apt-get won't install anything other than what you request on the
command line without user confirmation, unless you use an option to
shut that off (which the man page rightly says is dangerous).

Steve
-- 
steve@silug.org           | Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
(618)398-7360             | See web site for meeting details.
Steven Pritchard          | http://www.silug.org/

-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@silug.org with
"unsubscribe silug-discuss" in the body.